READ MORE: AS I LISTEN TO BORROWERS
One thing they have in common is that none them if they were in a court where the judge is operating cases in his court according to the rules of Article III of the constitution, could ever prove, or would even try to claim that they met the Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Article III Standing.
But few, if any, state court judges and few Federal Court judges are following those directives. No matter what brilliant idea you have read about concerning law, opinions, rulings, or Acts you have put the burden of proof on yourself in contradiction to your role defined in Article III.
You were never intended to bear the burden of proof that your foreclosing party was using fraudulent...everything against you. From the beginning, the foreclosing party had to prove that they had "concrete and particularized" evidence of their right to collect for you. If the judge did not review this evidence at the filing of your case to determine if the foreclosing party had met those constitutional requirements for Standing then the foreclosing party and the judge should lose and you should win.
But, attorneys will take you part of the way there and they do. But, you will not find an attorney who will accuse the judge of failing his oath to protect the constitution and suing the judge for the crime he committed and that is Depriving you of your Civil Rights. It is called the Deprivation of Civil Rights.
Now read the 3-part strategy of the fraudulent foreclosing party once again. That is what is happening to you and it is the judge and your attorney that allows it to happen.