WHY FORECLOSURE FRAUD CASES CANNOT BE WON NORMALLY...LIKE MOST CONTRACT LAW CASES IT IS THE COURT'S INHERENT BIAS & IGNORANCE AND THE BETRAYAL OF THEIR OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION
borrowers civil rightsConstitutional StandingStandingSubject Matter JurisdictionSue Your JudgeWrongful Foreclosure
"When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hang on."
-Franklin D. Roosevelt
WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT OFYOUR FORECLOSURECASE? FILL OUT THE FORM CLICK THIS LINE
After nine years of fighting Promissory Note and Mortgage Fraud and never actually losing a case (nor ever quite winning outright in a normal way), I have figured out exactly why a case cannot be won by a borrower in any conventional way, yet winning should always have been a dunk shot if adjudicated correctly according to the constitution. I was dumbfounded. I have nearly stopped helping others, at least until I prove convincingly that what I learned was right. Well, I am about to find out.
"CASES HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUDICATED CORRECTLY"?
By Danny Hammond
|
If you have tried to take your mortgage fraud case to court and you were absolutely convinced that you were a victim of fraud and you still want to fight your foreclosure, then you need foreclosure defenses to stop the judge from saying or demonstrating in any way his bias against borrowers or to completely dismiss all of the real facts in all cases.
I know how your civil rights work. What you believed so far is true and you were right. You just didn't have the proper info. You were fighting the wrong fight. If you have not taken your case to court yet, the above will happen when you do. I am using the simplest and most direct strategies to
overturn, or vacate, all foreclosures. The founding fathers knew that one-day judges would do this. they wrote the remedy into the constitution.
It has been there waiting for this time since 1787. CONTINUE READING